STOP Early Journal Content on JSTOR, Free to Anyone in the World This article is one of nearly 500,000 scholarly works digitized and made freely available to everyone in the world by JSTOR. Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the mid-seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non-commercial purposes. Read more about Early Journal Content at http://about.jstor.org/participate-jstor/individuals/early- journal-content . JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. GILGAMES AND ENGIDTJ, MESOPOTAMIAN GENII OP FECUNDITY "W. F. Albright American School of Oriental Research in Jerusalem Two of the most interesting figures in ancient mythology are the heroes of the Babylonian national epic, Gilgames and Engidu. In this paper they will be studied in as objective a way as possible, avoiding the knotty problems connected with the evolution of the epic. Even on the latter, however, some light may be thrown. A thousand and one tempting ideas come to mind, but our materials are still too scanty for the composition of a successful history of Mesopotamian literature and religion, as shown by the recent attempt of the brilliant philosopher of Leipzig, Hermann Schneider. 1 Thanks to the discovery of the temple library of Nippur, Sumerian literature is swelling so rapidly that few theories can be regarded as established beyond recall. On the other hand, our knowledge is now sufficiently definite to permit lucrative exploitation of comparative mythol- ogy and civilization ; indeed, since many of these problems may be treated on the molecular, if not the atomic principle (cf. JBL 37. 112), their solution is an indispensable prerequisite to the future history of Babylonian thought. My general attitude towards the methods and theories of comparative mythology is succinctly given JBL 37. 111-113. The name Gilgames is usually written d GlS-GIN {TV) -MAS, read Gi-il-ga-mes(s), the riAya/^os of Aelian, De natura anim., 12, 21 (Pinches, Babylonian and Oriental Record, vol. 4, p. 264). CT 2 12. 50. K 4359, obv. 17, offers the equation GI8-GIN-MAS- 1 See his KvXtur und Denken der Babylonier und Juden, Leipzig, 1910. 2 Note the following abbreviations in addition to those listed JAOS 39. 65, n. 2 : ABW = Archiv fur Beligionswissenschaft; BE = Publications of the Babylonian Expedition of the University of Pennsylvania; GE = Gil- games-epic; HT = Poebel, Historical Texts; JEA = Journal of Egyptian Archaeology; KTBI = Ebeling, Keilschrifttexte aus Assur religiosen Inhalts; NE = Haupt, Das Babylonische Nimrodepos ; PSBA=Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology; BA=Bevue d'Assyriologie; EBB = Bevue de I'Histoire des Beligions; UG = Ungnad-Gressmann, Das GU- gamesch-Epos, Gottingen, 1911; ZDMG = Zeitschrift der Deutschen Mor- genlandischen Gesellschaft. 308 W. F. Albright SI = Gis-gibil-ga-mes; CT 18. 30 ab. 6 ff. gives KALAG-GA- IMIN = il Gis-gibil-ga-mes, muqtablu, 'warrior,' and dlik pdna, 'champion, leader.' 3 The latter ideogram is merely an appella- tive describing him as 'the seven-fold valiant.' The full form of his name, d Gis-gibil-ga-mes (cf. SGI 87), is often found on early monuments, especially seals and votive inscriptions from Erech and the vicinity. In a sacrificial list from Lagas (De la Fuye, Documents, 54. 10. 6 ; 11. 5) his name appears in the form d Gis-gibil-gin-mes. As the sibilant must have been primarily s (see below), the second element takes the variant forms ginmas, games, and ginmes. Since the first of these writings is late, it may be overlooked in fixing the original pronunciation; the other forms point to a precursor *ganmes, which became ginmes by vocalic harmony, and games by syncope. The primary form of the name was, therefor, *Gibilganmes, whence, by contraction, Gilgames, the meaning of which will be considered below. According to Sumerian historiographers (Poebel, HT 75), Gilgames was the fifth king of the dynasty of Eanna (name of the ziqqurat of Erech), succeeding Meskingaser son of Babbar (the sun-god), who reigned 325 years, Enmerkar, his son (420), Lugalbanda, the shepherd (1200), and Dumuzi, the palm-culti- vator (100). 5 The hero himself was the son of the goddess Nin- sun, consort of the god Lugalbanda, and of A 6 , the enu or ramku (isib) -priest of Kullab, a town as yet unidentified, but certainly near Erech. A is also called the mes-sag JJnug (CT 24. 35. 29- 30), 'chief scribe of Erech,' an epithet translated CT 16. 3. 88 (cf. Schroeder, MVAG 21, 180) by nagir Kullabi (the relation of Erech and Kullab was like that existing between Lagas and Girsu). His consort is called Ningarsag, or Nin-gu-e-sir-ka, both 3 In alik pdni as a heroic appellative we may possibly have the source of the Babylonian royal name Orchamus of Ovid, Met. 4, 212, since Spxapos, 'leader of a row,' might well be a translation of the expression into Greek. 'Langdon, Tammuz and Ishtar, p. 40, n. 1. reads the name dGi-bil-aga- mis, taking TV to be originally MIS, =.-aga (Br. 6945), and rendering 'The god Gibil is commander. ' This is mere guess-work. 5 Poebel took Su-GAgunu to be equivalent to Btf-GA 'fisherman,' but Bar- ton {Archaeology and the Bible, p. 264, n. 3) is almost certainly right in explaining the group as St7-PES, and translating 'palm-tree-fertilizer,' an ideal occupation for a god of fecundity. e See Fortseh, OLZ 18. 367 ff. Sum. a means 'father' (for a'a, ada) ; A may have been himself a figure of the Attis type. Was his consort originally Ama, 'mother' (cf. Ama Engur) like Anatolian Mat Gilgames and Engidu 309 figures closely related to Ninsun. In the Babylonian recension of the second tablet of GE, recently published by Langdon, the mother of Gilgames bears the name rimtu m sa supuri Ninsunna, the rimat Ninsun of the Assyrian version (Poebel, OLZ 17. 4 ff.). The 'wild-cow of the fold' corresponds to Leah, consort of the ab(b)ir Ia c aqob, 'bull Jacob,' as pointed out JBL 37. 117. The king-list gives Gilgames only 126 years, hardly more than Tammuz, who was torn away in the flower of his youth. Evi- dently there is a close relation between the hero 's vain search for immortality and the short duration of his career. Like the son of Peleus and Thetis he was doomed to die young, a fate which was presumably the original reason assigned for his quest of life. The morbid fear of death and the desire to be freed from the venereal disease, which, as Haupt has made probable, the vin- dictive Istar had inflicted upon him, are, at all events, secondary motives, characteristic of a rather corrupt and cynical society, such as may well have existed in Erech during the last part of the third millennium. From SLT, No. 5, it appears that Gil- games preserved the title of high-priest of Kullab (en Kul- ab ki -ge) after being elevated to the throne. Both in GE and its Sumerian prototype he appears as the builder of the wall of Erech, a tradition mentioned in an inscription of Anam of Erech (twenty-second century). According to GE 11. 322 he was assisted in this work by seven wise architects (note the motive of the seven sages). In the Sumerian text of a Gilgames-epic, pub- lished by Langdon, we read (obv. 15-20; Engidu seems to be addressing the hero) : Vnug ki gis-kin-ti dingir-ri-e-ne-ge e-an-na e-an-ta e-de dingir-gal-gal-e-ne me-bi ba-an-ag-es-dm bad- gal bad an-ni ki-us-sa ki-ma-mag an-ni gar-ra-ni sag-mu-e-sum za lugal ur-sag-bi = 'In Erech, the handiwork 7 of the gods, Eanna, the temple which reaches heaven, 8 'Sum., gis-kin-ti (literally 'wooden-work taken hold of; contrast SLT 125), whence Tcishittu and hUTcattH (M. 753, 4033), means both 'handiwork,' and 'artisan'; ef. Langdon, Grammatical Texts, p. 26, n. 2. • Cf. Gudea, Cyl. A, 17, 18, etc, for an-ni us-sa, 'reach heaven'; the inser- ton of hi does not affect the sense, nor is the oxymoron intentional. 310 W. F. Albright Where the great gods gave their decrees, The great wall, the wall which reaches heaven, The mighty structure, 9 of celestial construction, Thou hast the supremacy (hast made head) ; thou art king and hero. ' This passage implies that Gilgames, of whom it is said (obv. 10- 11) gub-gub-bu-de su(KU)-$u-u-dd dumu-lugal-la da-ri e-ne = 'standing or sitting, ever the son of a king is he,' built the tem- ple Eanna and the wall of the city. A reference to the erection of Eanna is found GE 1, 10 ; see Poebel, HT 123. The founding of the city itself is ascribed in the Sumerian chronicle to Enmer- kar, lu Unuga mu-un-da-du-a. As might be expected, Gilgames was regarded as the special patron of the city, a position in which he may easily have enjoyed more popularity than the distant god of heaven, Anu, theoretic- ally the patron of Erech. Several centuries before Anam, Utu- gegal (ca. 2600), the liberator of Babylonia from the yoke of Guti, says in his triumphal inscription (Col. 3, 1 &. ; see BA 9. 115) : d Gis-gibil-ga-mes du[mu] d Nin-sun-na-ge maskim-sil ma- an-sum; dumu TJnug-ga dumu Kul-ab-ka sa-gul-la ba-an-gar = ' G, the son of N, he gave him as a guardian genius ; the people of Erech and Kullab he (Gilgames) made joyous of heart.' He received divine honors at Lagas and Nippur, presumably also elsewhere, while his cult survived into Assyrian times; cf. the image (galmu) of Gilgames mentioned Harper, Letters, 1. 56. In turning to consider the original nature of Gilgames, his solar characteristics become immediately apparent. The hero's adventures in the epic remind one involuntarily of the deeds of Heracles and Samson, whose essentially solar nature is clear, even after sundry adscititious elements have been eliminated; mythology is a liberal master, employing motives of the most varied origin in its service. Like the sun-god, Samas, our hero (see the incantatory hymn, NE 93) is the da' an Anunnaki, 'the judge of the A'; like the sun, again, he is the ha'it kibrdti, 'the overseer of the regions' ; it is expressly stated (NE 93. 8) that the powers of Samas are delegated to him. Gilgames figures as Ner- gal, lord of the underworld, in SLT, No. 6, obv. 3. 10 f., ki-ag d Eres-ki-gal d Gis-gibil-ga-mes lugal-kiir-ra-ge = 'the beloved of * Ki-ma = fci-md (Tci-gar; cf. du(l) -mar-ra and Tci-dwr, both =: Subtu) . Gilgames and Engidu 311 E, Gilgames, lord of the mountain (i. e., the underworld).' In Langdon, Liturgies, No. 8, rev. 3, he receives the appellation umun-ki-ga-gd, 'lord of the underworld.' In the epic his mis- tress is Ishara, a form of Istar with marked chthonic associations. Whatever we may think of Egyptian and Greek parallels, in Babylonia it is the sun-god who appears as judge both of the liv- ing and of the dead, spending his time as he does half with the shades and half with mortals. "While the writing d Gis, found in the Meissner fragment and the Philadelphia text of the second tablet, is an abbreviation (cf. Poebel, OLZ 17. 5), it is interesting to note that d Gis is explained as Samas, and that gis also = isatu, 'fire' (SGI 98). As these equations suggest, Gilgames stands in close relation to the fire-gods (naturally in many respects solar) Nusku (cf. Hommel, OLZ 12. 473 ff.), Gibil (cf. his name), and Gira (cf. Maqlu 1. 37 ff.), who shares some of his attributes. In fact, Gira's ideogram d GlS-BAB (for reading cf. Meissner, OLZ 15. 117; for Gira < Gisbara cf. JA08 39. 87, note; this god must not be confused with d GlB, for whom see below) may be partly responsible for the late writing of the name of the hero as d GlS-GIN-BAB (MAS) . In the capacity of solar hero, Gilgames has much in common with 'his god' (ilisu, GE 6. 192) Lugalbanda. It may even be shown that the saga of Gilgames has been enriched by the spoils of the latter. In the story of the birth of Gilgamos, reported by Aelian, the Babylonian king Seuechoros (Seui7x o P°s) , warned by the astrologers that his daughter would bear a son who would deprive him of the kingdom, shut her up in the acropolis. How- ever, she was mysteriously visited, and bore a son, who was forth- with thrown from the tower. An eagle caught the child on its outstretched wings, and saved it to fulfil the decrees of fate. As Aelian observes, this is the well-known motive of Perseus, while the Babylonian sources available assign the Aeneas motive to the hero, who was the son of a priest of Kullab (originally a god) by the goddess of fertility. Lugalbanda, on the other hand, so far as the texts inform us, follows the Perseus recipe. He is the son of the sun-god, who, we may suppose, had visited his mother in the guise of a golden shower ; 10 he passes his youth as a shepherd 10 The motive of the golden shower is Oriental as well as Hellenic, and may safely be postulated as a common explanation of the mode of solar gen- 312 W. F. Albright before mounting the throne. It is very important to note that his predecessor, Enmerkar, is not called his father; he may safely, however, be regarded as his grandfather. Now, Sw^x / 305 is to be read TZmjxopos ; the initial C is simply dittography of the final C in the preceding word /WiAoWtos. Euechoros bears the same relation to Enmerkar (pronounced Enuerkar) as Euedora- (n)chos does to Enmeduranki (cf. also EveSwxos for Enmeduga, pronounced Enuedok). We may, therefor, tentatively supply the missing details of the Babylonian legend. Lugalbanda was the son of Enmerkar 's daughter by Samas. Being thrown from the tower by his grandfather's command, an eagle rescues him; an eagle carries the related Etana to heaven in a similar story. Lugalbanda grows up as a shepherd, and on reaching manhood is elevated by the favor of the gods to his rightful throne. In the later form of the story, transferred to Gilgames, the hero becomes a gardener, since this occupation had become the legend- ary prerequisite of kingship, as in the sagas of Sargon the Elder and Ellil-bani of Isin. My reconstruction of the Lugalbanda myth is supported by the indications in the fragments published HGT, Nos. 8-11, all belonging to a single epic, probably part of the Lugalbanda cycle, as follows from the mention of the storm-bird Im-dugud (Zu) in 11, 3. Prom this text we learn that Enmerkar, son of [Mes- ingaser] (8, rev. 10), was a mighty king, ruling in Kullab with- out a rival (8, obv. 4 if.). Unfortunately, however, the throne has no heir (9, rev. 5 f.: aratta [LAM-Kt/B-BV-KI] as-ba - - - a-bil [=i-bil (BA 10. 97)= ablu] nu-tug-da). The poem goes on to introduce the kurku bird (9, rev. 9 ff.) : kur-g¥> u ki-a [ ] pa-te-si Sumer u -ra [ ] mu-da-ku-u-de kin-gi-a En-me-ir-kdr en- nun [ ] = ' The kurku bird in the land [ ] the viceroy of Sumer [ ] to nourish [ ] the messenger of Enmerkar [held] watch.' Tho the name of Lugalbanda does not occur, we can hardly doubt that this passage alludes to the rescue of the youthful hero from his hostile grandfather by the kurku bird (who may be an inter- eration. In Hindu tales {Indian Antiquary, Vol. 20, 145; Vol 21, p. 374) a traveler, before setting out on a journey, tells his pregnant wife that the birth of a son will be announced to him by a shower of gold, of a daughter by a shower of silver. These showers are primarily metaphorie expressions for the golden and silver rays of the sun and moon, respectively male and female according to the most general belief. Gilgames and Engidu 313 mediary for Zu, whose relations with our hero would then date from the latter 's infancy). Lugalbanda, 11 with the consort Ninsun, was the principal god of Marad, 12 whence he bore the name Lugal-Marada (AMAB- da), and of Tuplias (Asnunnak) in eastern Babylonia. He also received divine honors at Erech and Kullab, especially during the dynasty of Amnanu (ca. 2200). Accordingly he is listed among the legendary kings of the postdiluvian dynasty of Erech. Lugal- banda and Ninsun were worshiped also elsewhere, as at Lagas and Nippur ; a patesi of the former city bears the name Ur-Nin- sun. Lugalbanda belongs to the same class of modified sun-gods as Ninurta, and hence is combined with Ninsubur and Ningirsu, deities of this type (ILR 59, rev. 23 f.). In a hymn published by Radau (Hilprecht Anniv. Vol., Plates 6-7; cf. p. 418), he is addressed as hug 13 d Lugal-banda gu-ru-um kur-ra = 'holy L, offspring of the mountains,' and identified with Babbar (Samas) : sul d Babbar zi-zi-da-zu-de Tcalam igi-mu-e-da-zi-zi = ' Hero Bab- bar, when thou risest, over the land thy eye thou dost lift, ' etc. Like Gilgames, and other old gods of productivity, he came to occupy a prominent position in myth and legend, thanks to the annual celebration of his adventures in mimetic fertility rites. I would not attempt to decide whether his role as shepherd came from solar symbolism (cf. AJSL 34. 85, n. 2), or is on a par with the pastoral aspect of other gods of fecundity (cf. JBL 37. 116 f.) ; both conceptions doubtless played a part. Around the figure of Lugalbanda seasonal and reproductive myths soon crystallized, later spreading from their original home, and developing into the heroic legend, the prototype of the true saga, with its historical nucleus and lavish display of mythical and romantic finery. The saga could not spring, as some appear to think, full-armed from the popular fancy, but had to grow apace as utilitarian cult-motives whetted the imagination. Lugalbanda became the focus of a legendary cycle of very great u Radau, EUprecht Anniv. Vol., p. 429, points out that Lugalbanda as lord of TupliaS is Tispak, the am-banda = rvmu eqdu (Ar. ' dqada = Sadda) ; hence his name means 'mighty king,' rather than 'wise king.' 12 Modern Wannet es-Sa'dun, on the Euphrates, nearly due west of Nippur; see Clay, OLZ 17. 110 f., and Thureau-Dangin, BA 9. 84. " For reading hug cf. Luckenbill, AJSL 33. 187. 314 W. F. Albright interest, 14 since its perfected form, found in the myth of Lugal- banda and Zu, is written in Sumerian, while our Gilgames-epic is a Semitic composition, however much it may have drawn on Sumerian sources. Besides the Assyrian translation of over a hundred lines (KB 6. 1. 46 ff.) we now possess goodly fragments of the original Sumerian : CT 15. 41-43 ; HGT, Nos. 14-19, and probably also 8-11 (see above) ; in Nos. 20-21 we have part of a chronicle dealing with events during the reigns of Lugalbanda and his successor Tammuz (cf. HT 117). Most of the latter text apparently refers to Lugalbanda, since Tammuz is not mentioned until the close. Along with victorious invasions of Elam, IJalma (=Guti), and Tidnu m (=Amuru), a disastrous flood which overwhelmed Eridu is described (obv. 11-12) : a-uru-gul- la-ge [ ] NUN-KI a-gal-la si-a [ ] <= 'the waters of the destruc- tive deluge Eridu, flooded by the inundation [ ].' In con- nection with this the deus ex machina, Ninlil, comes on the scene ; despite the pseudo-historical setting we are dealing with myth. The story of Lugalbanda and Zu, personification of the hurri- cane, is primarily, as has often been observed, the contest between 14 It is possible that the saga of Nimrod may be an offshoot of the Lugal- banda cycle rather than of the Gilgames cycle, especially since the former seems to have been much more important than the latter in early times, and from a home in Marad more likely to influence the west than the latter, whose hearth was Erech. As lord of Marad Lugalbanda is the Lugal-Mardda or the *Nin-Marada, just as Nergal-Lugalgira is the Nin-CHrsu, the lord of Girsu, and as Marduk is the Nin-Tintir (IL3 59, obv. 47), Ellil the Nin- Nibru, or Lord of Nippur (ibid. 9) ; cf. also Sin the Bel-garr&n, etc. The heroic shepherd and conqueror of wild-beasts, *Nimardd, may thus have become the mighty hunter, Nimrod, just as Dagdn becomes Dagdn, and Haddd 'ASwSos. Similarly the shepherd Damu (Tammuz) became in Byblos the hunter Adonis. The figure of Nimrod was probably influenced by the impressive monumental representations of the Assyrian Heracles; he may easily reflect a western 'Orion,' but Eduard Meyer's view that he was primarily a Libyan ' Jagdriese' is gratuitous. The recent historical theories are still less felicitous: Sethe (Hastings' Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, Vol. 6, p. 650) holds that Nimrod is a corruption of the official name Nebmu 3c ere c of the indolent Amenophis III, appearing in cuneiform as Nimmurija; Van Gelderen (Expositor, 1914, pp. 274 ff.) explains Nimrod as a corruption of Naramsin, historically possible, but phonetically incredible. Jensen's explanation, deriving Nimrod from *Namurta, his reading of NIN-IB, is antiquated by the discovery of the correct reading Ninwrta, which became Inuita (JA08 38. 197), a form quite unlike Nimrod. Gilgames and Engidu 315 the sun and the storm-clouds, whom he subdues, just as Marduk overcomes Ti'amat in the cosmogonic reflection of the motive. Without entering into an elaborate discussion of the myth, which I hope to treat elsewhere, I will call attention to an episode which has apparently influenced the Gilgames cycle. Lugalbanda 's journey to Mount Sabu, where the wine-goddess Ninkasi-Siris helps him to outwit Zu. and recover the tablets of fate, is in some respects the prototype of Gilgames' visit to the wine-goddess Sabitu. In OE the episode of Sabitu's mountain paradise is decidedly in the air ; in the older recension, however, it is clearer ; instead of being merely in charge of a station on the hero 's route to Elysium, she is his real goal. 15 Only after he despairs of securing from her the immortality for which he yearns does he undertake the perilous voyage to Utnapisti 1 ™. As I shall show in detail elsewhere, the wine-goddess Sabitu becomes in effect the divinity of life; in her hands was supposed to rest the bestowal of eternal life, so far as this was terrestrially obtainable. Her name is derived from Mount Sabu, 18 the abode of Ninkasi, with whom, as will be shown elsewhere, Siduri Sabitu is essentially identical. I have proved, AJSL 35. 179, that the neighboring Mount Hasur, the abode of Zu, is Kasiari-Masius, and that Sabitu's garden lay in the same region, which corresponds to the northern habitat of the soma, as well as to the vineyard-paradise of Anatolia. As clearly indicated in the fragments of the myth, Lugalbanda recovers the dupsimdti by inviting the bird to a banquet, and intoxicating him with the aid of the goddess of conviviality — a motive which reappears in a multitude of similar tales of the Marsyas type. The motive is closely associated with the soma cycle of the Indo- Iranians, as will be shown in another article ; two distinct motives have evidently been fused, the eagle being the tertium compara- tionis. The dupsimati belong with the motive above referred to, as they appear also in the creation myth ; Lugalbanda originally 15 Cf. JAOS 38. 61-64; additional evidence will be adduced in my article 'The Mouth of the Bivers,' AJSL 35. 161-195, and in a paper entitled 'The Goddess of Life and Wisdom, ' to appear in AJSL. "Mount Sabu, probably the name of a northern mountain, near Gasur- Kasjari-Masius (see my article in AJSL, cited in the preceding note), was perhaps selected because of the paronomasia with saM, 'wine,' and its congeners. 316 W . F. Albright goes after the fertilizing rains, symbolized by wine, just as Indra wrests the soma from the bird Garuda, and bestows it upon the thirsty land. As the draught of the gods is also the potion of immortality, this is at the same time a journey in search of life. That Gilgames' visit to Sabitu was originally vicarious, made on behalf of his people, is highly probable ; he was a god of fer- tility (see below). The individualizing of the myth naturally resulted in the idea that his mission was vain ; did he not die at a relatively early age (see above) ? The journey to the Mouth of the Rivers, originally to bring the inundation, has undergone the same modification. As Lugalbanda is a more pronounced sun-god than Gilgames, it is interesting to note that solar motives are unquestionably worked in with our episode ; GE 9, Col. 4, 46, the nightly journey of the sun thru the harrdn Samsi of the underworld, in order to be reborn from the womb of the mother- goddess the next morning, is expressly alluded to. It may be that the myth has gained admission to the epic cycle thru the influence of the solar analogy. In the cult, at least, the solar side of Gilgames was quite subordi- nate to his aspect as a god of fecundity. The chthonic character of our divinity, while in its specific development implying solar relationship, is no less an indication of kinship with gods of vege- tation. We cannot, therefore, be surprised to find many Tummuz- motives in the cycle of Gilgames; his amours with Ishara and Istar are vegetation-myths (cf. JBL 37. 115-130). Some of the evidence presented to show that Gilgames was primarily a god of vegetation by Schneider, in his suggestive essay, 17 is not valid, but the main thesis, if somewhat broadened to include the various functions of a god of fertility, is certainly correct. Equally cogent is Prince's view (Babyloniaca, 2. 62-64), tho the explana- tion of d Gl8-GIN-MA§ as 'heros divin de la production' leaves the older writings of the name entirely out of consideration. The symbol of the god was the ^a-am d Gilgames (CT 15. 14, rev. 11, 13), with the Semitic equivalent ildaqqu (for *ig-daqqu, 'small tree'), 'sprout, slip.' Hommel (OLZ 12. 473 ff.) has ingeniously connected the e il a-am (lit. 'plant of the water of the wild bull') with the cylinder of Sargon the Elder, representing a hero of the Gilgames type watering a wild-bull from a stream, over which a 17 Zwei Aufsatze zur Beligionsgeschiohte Vorderasiens, pp. 42-84. Gilgames and Engidu 317 young shoot is growing. The scene is evidently symbolical ; the stream is the Euphrates, which provides growing vegetation and browsing cattle alike with the needful moisture. Similar repre- sentations, primarily serving the purpose of sympathetic magic, will be treated below. The a-am zi-da of Gudea, Cyl. A, 5, 8, and 6, 9, is a cult object, apparently a lustral laver, like the abzu; in Gudea 's dream it is placed before him, toward the sunrise, a position forcibly reminding one of the basin in the Qit Samsi of Silhak-in-Susinak (RT 31. 48), also, of course, placed toward the sunrise. The name may indicate that the basin was placed on the back of a bull, just as the laver of Solomon's temple was supported by twelve bulls, 18 symbolizing, as will be shown else- where, the origin of the water from the mouth of the bull Bnki, lord of the fresh water (see below), or his attendant bulls, the gud-sig-sig, donors of the fecundating water of the two rivers. 19 The gis-a-am, which presumably derived its name from the a-am by its side, from which it drew moisture, like the ildaqqu on the bank of the river, may have been a symbolic tree or post, like the wooden pole of Asirat or the dd-pillar of Osiris. 20 38 In this connection I may take up the problem touched JAOS 36. 232. Both kiiidr-lci-ur, 'platform,' and Tciiidr-Tciwu, 'laver,' are ultimately identi- cal. Primarily M-ur meant 'base, foundation-platform' (duru&su = isdu, temennu), whence, like Tci-gal, 'surface, site, ground,' it is used metaphori- cally for 'Hades' (cf. Langdon, Liturgies, p. 138). The explanation of ki-tir as nerib ergitim, 'entrance to the under- world, ' reminds one of the Egyptian mastaba, which served as a link between the two worlds. The shrine S-ki-ur in Mppur reminds one of a shrine near Thebes which seems to have been regarded as an entrance to the underworld; ef. Foucart, PSBA 32. 102 ff. The laver Tciurv, may have received its name from being on a platform, or it may symbolize the lower world, like the apsu, the big laver from which the egubbg were replenished; see my article on 'The Mouth of the Rivers, ' A JSL 35. 161-195. 19 Of., for the present, Frank, Beligion, p. 275. 20 When a tree in which a great numen of fertility resided died, the trunk often remained an object of veneration, being replaced finally by a symbolic post, usually representing a palm or cedar. Lutz has brilliantly shown that the d *mwni (like mutin, 'vine,' for mu$tin> gestin)> *munu (by vocalic harmony) > gunu. An increasing number of parallels, which I am collecting, shows that such a relation between EME-KU and EME-SAL, or litanic (Haupt) forms is quite regular. Gilgames and Engidu 323 Like Tammuz, the d Sib ( = re'u), Si Sumuqan is a shepherd, guardian of all animal life, wild as well as tame. KTBI, No. 19, obv. 2 f., Sumuqan is called ndqidu ellu m massu sa Ani sa ina put karsi nam sibirra = ' holy shepherd, leading goat of Anu, who carries the shepherd's staff before the flock ( ?).' In 13 we hear of the bul Sumuqan, his cattle, and in 15 his name is followed by nam(m)aste sa Qi[ri m ], 'the beasts of the plain.' The text is a hymn to Samas; in the first line we must read ^Sumuqan ma (!)r[u] naramka, 'S, the son whom thou lovest'; Sumuqan •was the son of the sun. Similarly, 8LT, No. 13, rev. 13, we find Su-mit-un-ga-anzi-gal si-in-ba-ar u-si-im-dib-a = ' S, who oversees living creatures and provides them with herbage.' Accordingly, when wild animals were needed for sacrificial pur- poses, Sumuqan had first to be appeased, that his dire wrath over the slaughter of his creatures might be averted. In the interest- ing 'scape-goat' incantation (ASKT, No. 12), S5 Enki, after giv- ing Marduk his commission, instructs him: d Sumuqan dumu d Babbar sib-nig-nam-ma-ge mas-da d Edin-na gu-mu-ra-ab-tum- ma; d Nin-ildu (IGI-LAMGA-GID) lamga-gal-an-na-gl illuru 3B su-kug-dim-ma-na gu-mu-ra-ab-tum-ma; mas-da d Edin-na du-a igi- d Babbar-su u-me-ni-gub. lugal-e - - - mas-da igi- d Babbar-su ge-en-slg-ga (rev. 10 ff.) = 'Let Sumuqan, sun of Samas, shepherd of everything, bring a gazelle of the desert; let Ninildu, the great artificer of heaven, bring a bow made by his pure hands ; place the gazelle toward the sun. Let the king shoot the gazelle, (facing) toward the sun.' When the gazelle is shot, the sin and sickness of the king leave him and enter the beast. Zimmern, Ritualtafeln, No. 100, 25, a wild-sheep, [sa] ibbanu ina supuri elli ina tarba$i sa Gira (written Gir-ra) = 'which was created in the pure enclosure, in the fold of Gira' (i. e., in the wilderness), is presented for sacrifice. Sumuqan is in a special sense the god of animal husbandry, the fecundity of cattle, and even their fructification being ascribed to 34 Cf. Zimmern, TamUz (Abh. Sachs. Ges. Wiss., VoL 27), p. 8. 85 While it must be admitted that the mds-gul-dub-ba was killed before the termination of the ceremony, the seape-goat was turned loose to be devoured by wild-beasts, which amounts to the same thing, so Prince and Langdon are justified in employing the term. For the debate between Prince and Fossey see JA, 1903, 133 ff. 30 For reading see Langdon, MA 12. 74. 17, and 79, n. 7. 324 W. F. Albright his agency. 37 Thus we read (ibid. 35 ff.) : andsikunusi - - - puhdtta sa azlu Id ishitu elisa, rihut Sumuqan Id imquta ana libbisa = 'I bring you a ewe-lamb, upon which a wild-sheep has not yet leaped, into which the sperm of Sumuqan has not yet fallen.' The most important passage is Maqlu, 7, 23-30, hith- erto misunderstood : — siptu : ardhika rdmdni ardhika pagri kima Sumuqan irhu bulsu lahru immersa Qabitu armasa atdnu mursa, nartabu ergiti m irhu ergiti™ imhuru z$rsa. addi sipta ana rdmdni' a; lirhi rdmdnima lisegi lumnu, u kispi sa zumri'a lis- suhu Hani rabuti = Incantation : I impregnate thee, myself ; I impregnate thee, my body, just as Sumuqan impregnates his cat- tle, and the ewe (conceives) her lamb, the gazelle her fawn, the she-ass her colt, (just as) the noria 38 impregnates the earth, and the earth conceives her seed. I apply the incantation to myself ; may it impregnate me and remove the evil; may the great gods extirpate the enchantment from my body. ' In the same way we have, PSBA 23, 121, rev. 11, kima samu irhu ir$iti im'idu sammu = 'just as heaven impregnates earth (with rain) and herbage increases.' The passage has been misunderstood also by Lang- don, Tammuz and Ishtar, p. 93, n. 8 ; rahu has just as concrete a meaning here as GE I, Col. 4, 21. As patron of animal husbandry Sumuqan becomes the princi- ple of virility. Hence his association with the remarkable rite of masturbation, by the ceremonial practise of which evil was expelled. We need not suppose that in Assyrian times the rite was more than symbolical ; originally, however, it must have been actually performed. In Egypt one of the most popular myths represented the creator, Atum, as creating the gods in this way (cf. Apophis-book, 26, 24 f. ; Pyramid 1248: 'Atum became an onanist [iws'w] while he was in Heliopolis. He put his phallus in his fist, in order to satisfy his hist with it [udnf hnnf m hf'f, irf " To use current terminology, he is the mana residing in the male. 68 The gi&apin = nartabu was probably a great undershot water-wheel, Ar. na 'ura; Heb 'of an, 'wheel' may be derived from epinnu (of. Maynar'd, AJSL 34. 29) < apin (in this connection I would like to point out another Hebrew word derived from Sumerian [cf . AJSL 34. 209] : moraj, ' threshing sledge, ' is Sum. marra§ = narpasu, with the same sense, as is certain from the ideogram (cf. SGI 175), which means 'sledge to thresh grain,' or tribula). The ancient Babylonians may also have employed the cerd (Meissner, BA 5. 1. 104 f.). Gilgames and Engidu 325 ndm nit imf]. The two twins, §u and Tefene, were born'). 8 * The Aegaean peoples doubtless possessed similar ideas about the origin of life, preserved in a modified form in the hermaphrodite god of fecundity, Phanes, who, according to Suidas, was por- trayed atSoioc ixv Tqv o~vvovo~iav TavTtjv evprjjxa elvai tov Ilavds, ore rrjs 'H^ovs ipturOtls ovk i&waro Xafiiiv** * rote ovv tov *Epp.rjv (the ithyphallic, like Eg. Min) Si8a£v